We write our
narratives on Facebook through statuses, “likes”, information and pictures which
“we draw on to construct ourselves” (van Luyn, 2013) in a genuine way. When we
share information especially pictures, we are portraying real life events and
feelings which in turn creates an understanding of our personal space and
environment around us. We can change a somewhat abstract space into a place of
great meaning through our interaction with that place. This interaction is
enhanced when we write a descriptive caption (van Luyn, 2013) allowing the
words to “impart emotion and personality, and hence high visibility to objects
and places” (Tuan, 1979, p.685). These images allow others to highlight the invisible
elements of ourselves and the environment and make them visible for us to see
again which helps us to understand our true selves (van Luyn, 2013).
![]() |
Figure 1: Our network of friends in real life is often the same as on Facebook |
On Facebook there is high interaction with others who, as
Tuan (1979) puts it, “help each other to build place” (p.689). Friends contribute
to our walls via statuses, likes and pictures therefore constantly building our
narratives and ensuring they are kept real and accurate. We can also contribute
to our friend’s messages and statuses which can create a feeling of community,
belonging and empowerment. These feeling are enhanced by the colloquial and “text”
language used which creates a sense of family and security in our space. Friends’ interaction and participation on our walls and private messages
make us feel “cool and famous” but if we don’t have a lot of virtual “friends” we
become inconspicuous just like Gary did when he put on the Google Glass (Budelis,
2013). We have the right to say or do what we want but those with greater power
or “cooler friends” have the ability to silence the less powerful narratives
(van Luyn, 2013).
To me, Facebook
narratives and the sense of space they portray is definitely a “shadow biography”
(McNeill, 2012, p.111) of our real lives. It is a way of telling others our real
stories and for us to learn more about ourselves.
References
Budelis,
Kristina. (2013). The NewYorker. Retreived
from http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/07/video-gary-shteyngart-google-glass.html
McNeill, L. (2012). ‘There
is no “I” in network: Social networking sites and posthuman auto/biography’. In Biography 35.1 (pp
101 - 118)
Tuan, Y-F. (1991). ‘Language
and the making of place’. Annals of the
Association of American Geographers (pp.684-696) Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Van Luyn, A. (2013).
BA1002: Our Space: Networks, narratives and the making of place, Lecture 5, part
3. [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://learnjcu.edu.au
Van Luyn, A. (2013).
BA1002: Our Space: Networks, narratives and the making of place, Lecture 5, part
1. [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://learnjcu.edu.
Figure 1:
Dennis Kreative Idea. (2012). We're Facebook Friends......? [image]. Retrieved from: http://dkidiscussion.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/were-facebook-friends.html
I agree with the statement you wrote in your blog "it is a way of us telling others our real stories and for us to learn more about ourselves." As everyone gets involved with each others lives through reading personal statuses and liking photos. This statement also supports Zuckerberg statement that Facebook gives us "the ability to highlight and curate all your stories so that you can express who you really are" (McNeill, 2012, pp. 107). Also the use of colloquial language and text on Facebook creates a sense of belonging for each member as it"enables us to understand the quality (the personality or character) of place better" (Tuan,1991, pp. 694).
ReplyDeleteReference
McNeill, L. (2012). There is no "I" in network: social networking sites posthuman auto-biography. in biography, 35(1), 101-118
Tuan, Y. (1991). Language and the making of place: A narrative-descriptive approach. In Annals of association of American Geographers, 81(4)' 684-696